Bite Me: Saying No to Breed Specific Legislation
63
Bite Me: Saying No to Breed-Specific Legislations
In the
United States alone, over 73 million dogs reside in homes all over
the country, not including the stray and homeless. Imagine approximately
half of those dogs disappearing, would this dramatic change not come as a
nightmare? Strangely enough, this very act may occur in our near futures
thanks to various dog attacks that happen annually around the country. This
path cannot provide the adequate solution due to its radical tactics and
extreme restrictions. Another way exists, however, and it will prove more
effectual.
Breed-Specific Legislation, or
BSL, refers collectively to any legal law
that bans, restricts, or singles our specific breeds, types, appearances, or
weights of dogs to be subject to various consequences. (Wikipedia)
Apparently prejudice sinks even low enough to effect God’s most loyal
creatures. BSL bans not only entire breeds and mixes but even dogs similar
in appearance to those banned or restricted. This profound act, in one Iowa
county, even bans all dogs weighing in or at one hundred pounds, with no
definition between natural weight, health, or obesity. From a realistic
standpoint, one could infer that this lunatic ban has more to do with simple
intimidation factors than actual aggression levels.
It could be said that BSL
began as the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 that
originated in the United Kingdom. This law referred mainly to four
particular breeds of dogs: ‘Pit bulls’, which is not even a single breed,
the Tosa, Dogo Argentino, and Fila Brasilerio. (DeedNotBreed) All of these dogs
belong to
the bull dog or mastiff family, breeds of large powerful dogs. BSL targets
types of breeds, mainly those of German descent, such as Staffordshire Bull
Terriers, American Pit Bull Terriers, Boxers, and Rottweilers. According to
an article by Jesse Leavenworth in the Hartford Courant, however, these dogs
scored above average on an evaluation given by the American Temperament Test
Society. They scored 85.2, 84.1, 85.6, and 82.7, respectively. (Leavenworth
par 4) The researcher believes that this proves these creatures, which serve
as police, therapy, and rescue dogs, pose no more of a threat than other
breeds in terms of natural human-aggression.
Unbiased, government
statistics provide accurate and reliable information
for researchers. According to a study concerning dog related fatalities in
the U.S. by the Center of Disease Control and Prevention, huskies and husky
mixes accounted for twenty-one. Siberian Huskies are not commonly mentioned
in Breed Specific Legislation laws. ‘Pit bull type’ dogs and mixes accounted
for seventy-six deaths. While this number may seem large, one must consider
that this term refers to at least eight different breeds, which puts them
individually attacking roughly nine to ten people, a number lower than that
of the husky. You also must consider the fact that only large and powerful dogs
will account for death; odds of a chihuahua killing very many people is slim,
though they may frequently bite.
The Pit Bull Terrier is one of
the most incorrectly identified dog breeds
due to misidentification. A particular online source notes this breed as
having sunny personalities and being sweet, curious, intelligent, and
clownish, outgoing, affectionate, and very eager-to-please. (Wikipedia)
In addition,
all animals have two types of distinct aggression. Human-aggression and
animal-aggression, the latter being like a natural hunt or prey instinct.
Human-aggression is not something a dog is born with, and it must be integrated
into the dog through violence or mistreatment. It is a common misconception
that bull terrier type dogs are human-aggressive due to their history as
fighting dogs. However, these dogs were raised to be loyal and gentle towards
their handlers. At any moment during a fight the dogs might have to be dragged
apart by their owners, carried, or cared for. A dog that seemed to pose a
threat to its handler would have been put down immediately. (Harwelik)
The key to solving this
problem realistically would obviously surface in
the act of prevention. One should account for the several factors present in
dog bite incidents. In the past, dog bites to males occurred two times as
much as those to females, male dogs appearing more frequently in the role of
attacker, and fifteen to twenty percent of the time the victim was a
stranger to the dog. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention stated
that a chained dog becomes almost three times as likely to attack a person
and an unfixed dog becomes three times as inclined as well. (Polsky)
Chaining a dog for long periods of time without supervision eliminates its
natural ‘fight or flight’ instincts. While tethered and feeling threatened
or nervous, the dog can only fight because it no longer possesses the option
of fleeing. In addition, socialization presents itself as a very important
asset in a dog’s tolerance and tranquility levels.
Dogs typically communicate
with non-canines through body language. Humans
usually seem out of tine with their pets in this aspect. A major mistake
most humans make when approaching a dog: eye contact. To a dog this means
dominance, or a challenge of authority and territorial rights. This poses a
definite problem for small children, who do not know better and stand at eye
level with most dogs. This would explain why a majority of attacks that
occur to children who approach unfamiliar or restrained dogs. If you become
interested in petting an unfamiliar animal always ask the owner first,
typically they know the temperament of their companion. Never pat a dog on
the head, this often would be a sign of overpowering in a dog’s eyes;
scratching under the chin or petting a dog along the spine would suffice and
not create a tension. The best way to introduce yourself would be in a
non-direct approach, seeming uninterested in the dog, and then slowly
becoming more aquatinted. (Dogscouts)
Education becomes vital when
dog attacks begin to occur frequently. Several
simple tips exist that, if taught and made aware, would keep many of these
tragic incidents nonexistent. Dog attacks are due to ignorant, apathetic, or
irresponsible owners and not the specific dog’s entire breed.
Works Cited Below
Harwelik, Mary. http://www.realpitbull.com/fight.html “Online Source for American Pit
Bull Terrier Info.”
Leavenworth, Jesse.
Sacks, Jeffrey J.Vet Med Today: Special Report.
“Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between
1979 and 1998”.
Thomas, Jennifer. http://www.stopbsl.com/. “Intro”
http://www.nahee.org/.
“National Association for Humane and Environmental Education.” Human Society,
2007.
http://www.understand-a-bull.com/
“Breed-Specific Legislation (BSL)”, 2005.
http://www.hsus.org
“US Pet Ownership Statistics”. Humane Society, 2007
CommentsLoading...
I've owned a variety of dogs over my lifetime...from labs to pitbulls. My pitbull was as docile as my lab around others. Both were very good with children, and the pit was less excitable around very young children. It is distressing to me that people are scared of certain breeds due to the bad press surrounding them, instead of understanding that each dog is an individual. Great hub! :D
BSL is something we must fight! Even thoes that do not own a pit bull or any other "dangerous" dog breed must fight! Soon it will effect all dogs. We need to stand up and lay the blame where it belongs, on the owners! It is irresponsible owners that cause dangerous dogs and these attacks. Any dog in the wrong hands can become dangerous.
BSL=bull shit legeslation! Pits are great dogs and the blame needs to place where it belongs, on irresponsible owners. I am moving to an apartmen or duplex and because of ignorance an fear will be having to re-home my pit baby Koopa. Luckly I have a good friend that can take him and i will still be able to watch my pitty grow up. But many pits aren't this lucky and many lose their lives do to our ignorance
the breed is not the problem in aggressive nature,it is solely the owners lack of responsibility.my daughter was bit in the face by a chocolate lab after the owner said that he was ok to be around.the owner walked out of sight and left my kids alone with his free roaming dog











rosks304 2 years ago
I do not debate the merits and demerits of BSL as I would not debate whether Rape,Paediaphilia,Murder should be legalised.They are all wrong.BSL was created by Adolph Hitler to rid the world of the Jewish population,and this law should have been buried with him.It did not work then and it will not work now.
I am of the opinion that this particular piece of garbage legislation has very little to do with the animals but rather Failing Politicians who are not capable of handling real issues so they attempt to jump onto the bandwagon,"Look my Voter I am protecting you from those Vicious Pitbulls that are Mauling our small children and our litle old ladies"With the help of some sensational media hype a fear campaign is created and the politico receives a few more votes.
The reality wherever there is BSL it is found that the authorities do not address the "dog-fighting" problem but rather start Murdering Family Pets,much easier and safer going after law-abiding citizens than Dangerous Criminals.
smarock10@yahoo.com